3000 + military and intelligence personnel,
engineers, architects, professors, pilots do not believe the official account of 9/11.
FREE DOWNLOAD: "9/11 UNVIELED"
TRUMP:
"they had bombs,"
America Under Attack, Fox5NY, September 11, 2001
Donald Trump Interviewed by Stephan Bachenheimer on Deutsche Welle, September 13, 2001
"All the proffered evidence that America was attacked by Muslims on 9/11,
when subjected to critical scrutiny, appears to have been fabricated" according to
David Ray Griffin,
Professor Emeritus, author of about three dozen books on theology and philosophy and
more than a dozen books on 9/11 -- including the just published "Bush
and Cheney: How They Ruined America and the World."
The FREE BOOK "9/11
Unveiled" by Enver Masud is a rebuttal of the
official account of 9/11. In criminal cases, the burden
of proving the defendant's guilt is on the prosecution, and they must establish that fact beyond
a reasonable doubt.
18 U.S. Code § 1519 makes it a crime
to destroy, alter, or falsify records in Federal investigations.
"Scholars and professionals . . . have established beyond any reasonable
doubt that the official account of 9/11 is false and that, therefore, the
official 'investigations' have really been cover-up operations." -- Lt. Col.
Robert Bowman, PhD,
Former Director of Advanced Space Programs Development
"The 9/11 report is a joke. The question is: What's being covered up? Is
it gross malfeasance, gross negligence, misfeasance?" -- Raymond L. McGovern, 27-year
CIA veteran. Former Chairman, National Intelligence Estimates (NIE)
"It is as a scientist that I have the most trouble with the official
government conspiracy theory, mainly because it does not satisfy the rules
of probability or physics." -- Lt. Col. Karen U. Kwiatkowski, PhD, Former
Political-Military Affairs Officer in the Office of the Secretary of Defense
"Your countrymen have been murdered and the more you delve into it the more
it looks as though they were murdered by our government, who used it as an
excuse to murder other people thousands of miles away." -- Lt. Col. Shelton
F. Lankford, U.S. Marine Corps (ret) fighter pilot with 300+ combat missions
"I'm astounded that the conspiracy theory advanced by the administration
could in fact be true and the evidence does not seem to suggest that's
accurate." -- Col. Ronald D. Ray, U.S. Marine Corps (ret), Dep Asst Sec
Defense in Reagan Admin
"No aircraft hit the Pentagon. Totally impossible! You couldn't make the
turns with a 757. You couldn't fly it in over the highway. You couldn't fly
it over the light poles. You couldn't even get it that close to the ground
because of turbulence." -- Major Douglas Rokke, PhD, U.S. Army (ret)
"What we saw happen on that morning of September 11, 2001, was the result of
a highly-compartmentalized covert operation to bring about a fascist coup in
this country." -- Alan N. Sabrosky, Former Director of Studies, Strategic
Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College
"The information provided by the NTSB does not support the 9/11 Commission
Report of American Airlines Flight 77 impact with the Pentagon." -- Rob
Balsamo, Commercial airline pilot (4000+ hours), Co-founder Pilots for 9/11
Truth
" . . . it would have been highly improbable that even a seasoned American
test pilot, a military test pilot, could have flown a T-category, aircraft
like the 757, into the first floor of the Pentagon because of a thing called
Ground Effect." -- Capt. Fred Fox, Retired commercial airline pilot (33
years with AA)
"I was also a Navy fighter pilot and Air Combat Instructor, U.S. Navy
Fighter Weapons School, and have experience flying low altitude, high speed
aircraft. I could not have done what these beginners did." -- Commander
Ralph Kolstad, U.S. Navy (ret), commercial airline captain (27 years),
23,000+ total hours flown
"The Pentagon was not hit by a Boeing 757. A Boeing 757 did not crash in
Shanksville Pa." -- Gordon Price, Former Fighter Pilot Royal Canadian Air
Force, Retired Air Canada captain
". . . sometime in the near future, it will become common knowledge that the
events of 9/11 were an 'inside job' designed, engineered and committed by a
very large and 'in control' rogue element within our United States federal
government". -- Glen Stanish, Commercial airline pilot (15,000+ hours)
". . . an airplane that weighs 100 tons all assembled is still going to have
100 tons of disassembled trash and parts after it hits a building. There was
no wreckage from a 757 at the Pentagon." -- Capt. Russ Wittenberg, Retired
commercial pilot (30,000+ hours)
"In my opinion the building WTC 7 was, with great probability,
professionally demolished." -- Hugo Bachmann, Professor Emeritus, Former
Chairman of the Department of Structural Dynamics and Earthquake
Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology
"I have 'known' from day-one that the buildings were imploded and that they
could not and would not have collapsed from the damage caused by the
airplanes that ran into them." -- Daniel B. Barnum, Fellow American
Institute of Architects
"The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. . . . I
believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of
jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen
door." -- Frank A. DeMartini, Architect and WTC Construction Manager
" . . . all three World Trade Center high-rise buildings, the Twin Towers
and Building 7 were destroyed not by fire as our government has told us, but
by controlled demolition with explosives." -- Richard Gage, Founding member
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
"Symmetrical collapse is strong evidence of a controlled demolition. A
building falling from asymmetrical structural failure would not collapse so
neatly, nor so rapidly". -- David A. Johnson, B.Arch, Professor Emeritus,
F.AICP
"I looked at the drawings, the construction and it couldn't be done by fire.
So, no, absolutely not." -- Danny Jowenko, Proprietor, Jowenko Explosieve
Demolitie B.V. (European demolition and construction company)
"Obviously it [WTC 7] was the result of controlled demolition and scheduled
to take place during the confusion surrounding the day's events." -- Jack
Keller, Professor Emeritus, Fellow American Society of Civil Engineers
"The 9/11 Commission Report is fatally
flawed. The major conclusions of The 9/11 Commission Report, the official,
conspiracy theory, are false." -- Enver Masud, Former Acting Chief Strategic & Emergency
Planning, U.S. Dept of Energy, Consultant USAID and World Bank, author "9/11 Unveiled"
"9/11, a carefully crafted ersatz-religious event, crafted by atheist
neocons to dupe folks of good faith, has been exposed as a lie." -- Dr.
Kevin Barrett, Co-founder Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth,
Host of The Kevin Barrett Show and Truth Jihad Radio
"We have found solid scientific grounds on which to question the
interpretation put upon the events of September 11, 2001 by the Office of
the President of the United States" -- A. K. Dewdney, Professor Emeritus,
Member Scientific Panel Investigating Nine-Eleven
"Despite the absence of any visible fire at the time of collapse, the
government report alleges WTC Building 7 is the first and only steel-framed
high-rise building in the history of mankind to collapse simply as the
result of a fire." -- David L. Griscom, PhD,Research physicist, Member
Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice
"Muslims could not have had access to the . . . super controlled demolition
blasting agent found in . . . dust samples from Ground Zero or to the
buildings themselves to implant that material beforehand." -- James Hufferd,
PhD, Founder 911 Truth of Central Iowa, Grassroots Coordinator of
911Truth.org
"I provide thirteen reasons for rejecting the official hypothesis, according
to which fire and impact damage caused the collapse of the Twin Towers and
WTC 7, in favor of the controlled-demolition hypothesis." -- Steven Jones,
PhD, Former Professor of Physics, Principal Investigator U.S. DOE, Adv
Energy Projects
"Truth, Ethics and Professionalism are completely lacking in the official
aftermath and investigations surrounding the 911 disasters. Unfortunately we
went to war predicated on lies, sustained in lies, and perpetuated in lies."
-- Hamid Mumin, Ph.D., Prof. Engineer, past President of the Canadian
Council of Professional Geoscientists
" . . . this is the first time that families have been attempted to be
silenced through a special fund, . . . the airlines approached members of
Congress and the Senate to get their bailout and their immunity . . .
starting on 9/11." -- Mary Schiavo, JD, former Professor of Aviation and
Inspector General USDOT
"In my opinion the building WTC 7 was, with great probability,
professionally demolished". -- Jorg Schneider, Dr hc, Professor Emeritus,
Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
According to the "most influential English language philosopher of the nineteenth
century" John Stuart Mill (1806-73):
He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His
reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them. But if he is equally
unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what
they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion
... Nor is it enough that he
should hear the opinions of adversaries from his own teachers, presented as they state
them, and accompanied by what they offer as refutations. He must be able to hear them
from persons who actually believe them...he must know them in their most plausible and
persuasive form.
Six media giants control 90% of what we read, watch or listen to.
[Topping the list of potential new global bogeymen, however, are the Yellow Peril,
the alleged threat to American economic security emanating from East Asia, and the
so-called Green Peril--Leon T. Hadar, "The
Green Peril": Creating the Islamic Fundamentalist Threat," Cato
Institute, August 27, 1992]
Enver Masud, "FBI: Bin Laden Not Wanted for
9/11," The Wisdom Fund, June 8, 2006
FREE ebook "9/11 UNVEILED" Nixon advisor: "best short summary"
click headings to view evidence
180,000+ downloaded
Draft: Arabic, Chinese