Israel unleashed a furious military campaign on Lebanon's main airport,
highways, military bases and other targets Thursday, retaliating for scores
of Hezbollah guerrilla rockets that rained down on Israel and reached as far
as Haifa, its third-largest city, for the first time.
The death toll in two days of fighting rose to 57 people, including 10
Israelis, with the sudden burst of violence sending shock waves through a
region already traumatized by Iraq and the ongoing battles in the Gaza Strip
between Israel and Hamas. It shattered the relative calm in Lebanon that
followed Israel's pullout from its occupied zone in south Lebanon in 2000
and the withdrawal of Syrian forces last year. . . .
Israeli analysts warned that Syria, which supports Hezbollah and plays host
to Hamas' political leader Khaled Mashaal, could be Israel's next target.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said any Israeli attack against Syria
would be an aggression on the whole Islamic world and warned of a harsh
reaction . . .
Israel's offensive was among its heaviest in Lebanon since it invaded the
neighboring country and occupied its capital 24 years ago. . . .
[The main thesis is that the desire to obtain additional water sources has been a primary
influence on geostrategic interactions of Israel and its Arab neighbors.
Israeli efforts to utilize the waters of the Litani help explain the
establishment of the security zone in southern Lebanon. The apparent
decision by Israel to retain access to the river makes it difficult for
Lebanon to regain political stability and economic viability.--Hussein A.
Amery, "THE
LITANI RIVER OF LEBANON," Geographical Review, Jul93, Vol. 83 Issue 3, p229]
[Israel occupies southern Lebanon. Part of the Litani is located in this
region. There are conflicting reports and conclusions over whether or not
Israel is using the Litani. There is also a verbal struggle over which
country needs the Litani more, could make best use of it, and who,
therefore, should develop their use of the Litani. Although there is not an
armed struggle over it now, it has been involved in armed struggles in the
past (in the 1967 war, and in 1982) and it is conceivable that in the future
the struggles over it may become armed.--Angela Joy Moss, "Litani River and
Israel-Lebanon," American University, November 1997]
"Shebaa Farms:
A Lebanese Land Occupied by Israel," Shebaa Farms Foundation, 2001
[The Lebanese Hezbollah movement announced Wednesday the arrest of two
Israeli soldiers in southern Lebanon.--"Hezbollah arrests two Israeli
soldiers," Bahrain News Agency, July 12, 2006]
[Overnight Lebanon has been plunged into a role it endured for 25 years -
that of a hapless arena for other people's wars--David Hirst, "Israel's
monstrous legacy brings tumult a step closer," Guardian, July 14, 2006]
[In 1996, a group of pro-Israeli
Americans - including Richard Perle, James Colbert, Charles Fairbanks
Jr., Douglas Feith, Robert Loewenberg, David Wurmser, and Meyrav Wurmser -
prepared a policy statement for then-Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that
proposed a strategy of regime change as the only solution for Israel's
growing encirclement and isolation. The main problem, they averred in "A
Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm," was Syria, and the
troublesome border with Lebanon:
"Syria challenges Israel on Lebanese soil. An effective approach, and one
with which America can sympathize, would be if Israel seized the strategic
initiative along its northern borders by engaging Hizballah, Syria, and
Iran, as the principal agents of aggression in Lebanon."
. . . Soldiers in wartime are captured, not "kidnapped." If Hezbollah has
"kidnapped" those two Israeli soldiers, then how do we describe the jailing
of thousands of Palestinians, including hundreds of women and children, on
the basis of their alleged sympathy for Hamas--Justin Raimondo, "Israel Crosses the
Line," Antiwar.com, July 14, 2006]
[The right to defend a nation of people also applies to even the followers
of Hezbollah trying to regain still-occupied territory and prisoners held
illegally by Israel. . . .
There are real issues between Lebanon and Israel that should have been
settled with the help of the United States long ago. Israel failed to keep
her promise to make available maps of the 140,000 mines she left behind in
Lebanon. Three small sectors of land overlooking the Litani River were
retained by Israel and were the cause of complaints from the government of
Prime Minister Fuad Siniora, not just Hezbollah. The three Lebanese
prisoners that were moved by Israel, contrary to the Geneva
Convention prohibition against an occupying power transporting prisoners
into its own territory, should have been returned long ago.--"A reality
check: The three real issues between Israel and Lebanon," Council
for the National Interest, July 14, 2006]
[The capture of three Israeli soldiers by the Lebanese resistance movement,
Hizbullah, to bargain for prisoner exchange should come as no surprise -
least of all to Israel, . . . The prisoners Hizbullah wants released are
hostages who were taken on Lebanese soil. In the successful prisoner
exchange in 2004, Israel held on to three Lebanese detainees as bargaining
chips and to keep the battle front with Hizbullah open.
It is ironic, given Israel's bombing of civilian targets in Beirut, that
Hizbullah is often dismissed in the west as a terrorist organisation. In fact its military record is
overwhelmingly one of conflict with Israeli forces inside Lebanese
territory.--Amal Saad-Ghorayeb, "The
framing of Hizbullah," Guardian, July 15, 2006]
[But what would happen if the powerless Lebanese government had actually
unleashed air attacks across Israel the last time Israel's troops crossed
into Lebanon? What if the Lebanese air force then killed 73 Israeli
civilians in bombing raids in Ashkelon, Tel Aviv and Israeli West Jerusalem?
What if a Lebanese fighter aircraft bombed Ben Gurion airport? What if a
Lebanese plane destroyed 26 road bridges across Israel? Would it not be
called "terrorism"? I rather think it would. But if Israel was the victim,
it would also probably be Word War Three.--Robert Fisk, "What I am
watching in Lebanon each day is an outrage," Independent, July 15, 2006]
[THE REAL aim is to change the regime in Lebanon and to install a puppet
government. . . . As in 1982, the present operation, too, was planned and is
being carried out in full coordination with the US.--Uri Avnery, "The Real
Aim," Gush Shalom,
July 15, 2006]
[Iran's foreign ministry denies Israeli allegations that it supplied
missiles to Hezbollah--"Deadly Hezbollah
attack on Haifa," BBC News, July 16, 2006]
[. . . the countries remain officially in a state of war that has existed
since 1948--"History of
the Lebanese-Israeli Conflict," Associated Press, July 17, 2006]
[Lebanon received Mr Blair's suggestion of an intervention force with
something approaching surprise. After all, isn't there already just such a
force in the south right now, called the United Nations Interim Force In
Lebanon?--Robert Fisk, "'Blow up
my city and I'll blow up yours'," Independent, July 18, 2006]
[First, Israel's actions in no way can be seen as a legitimate response to the
small-scale attacks from Hamas and Hezbollah. . . .
Second, it's clear that Israel would never have launched this war without
having made the calculation that it would win the support of the United
States. The rest of the world is solidly aligned against Israel's
outrageously disproportionate attacks, but none of that matters. . . .
Third, by invading and bombing Lebanon and acting brutally to crush the
Palestinian Authority, Israel has created a unified field theory of the
Middle East's crises, uniting the escalating world showdown with Iran, the
unraveling civil war in Iraq, the crisis over Syria's role in Lebanon, and
the Arab-Israeli conflict itself into one big tangle.--Robert Dreyfuss, "Neocons Rise From Mideast Ashes,"
tompaine.com, July 18, 2006]
[The Palestinian Red Crescent estimated that fourteen thousand people,
mostly civilians, were killed and wounded in the first month of the
operation.--James Bovard, "Israel's Prior
Peacekeeping in Lebanon," lewrockwell.com, July 18, 2006]
[Now, Israel's rampage against a defenseless Lebanon - smashing airport
runways, fuel tanks, power plants, gas stations, lighthouses, bridges, roads
and the occasional refugee convoy - has exposed Bush's folly in
subcontracting U.S. policy out to Tel Aviv, thus making Israel the custodian
of our reputation and interests in the Middle East.--Patrick J. Buchanan,
"Where
are the Christians?," WorldNet Daily, July 18, 2006]
[The cold figures, combined with Israeli air attacks on civilian
infrastructure like power plants, electricity transformers, airports,
bridges, highways and government buildings, have led to accusations by
France and the European Union, echoed by some nongovernmental organizations,
that Israel is guilty of "disproportionate use of force" in the Gaza Strip
and Lebanon and of "collective punishment" of the civilian
populations.--Steven Erlanger, "With
Israeli Use of Force, Debate Over Proportion," New York Times, July
19, 2006]
[Yet, mindful of the decades-long fighting between Israel and Hezbollah - in
which kidnappings of soldiers have been the rule rather than the
exception - the assertion that Iran and Hezbollah aimed to draw Israel
into a major war remains unconfirmed.--Trita Parsi, "It's not
just about Hezbollah," Inter Press Service, July 20, 2006]
[ . . . they started this in the late '60s, when there was a couple Fatah
guerrillas in South Lebanon. They bombed Beirut Airport in 1968 for the
first time. Then what they got back was a much bigger Lebanese resistance, a
leftist nationalist resistance, with the PLO. Then they went into Lebanon in
the '70s, and then in '80 they occupied South Lebanon, and they reaped in
return for that Hezbollah. And they went into Hezbollah in 1996.--Rami
Khouri, "Israel
Warns 300,000 Lebanese To Flee Homes as Ground Invasion Nears,"
democracynow.org, July 21, 2006]
[Israel's relationship with the United States is unique in a number of ways.
And one of those ways is that essentially the United States provides 20% of
the Israeli military budget on an annual basis, and then about 70% of that
money that is given from the United States, from U.S. taxpayers, to Israel
is then spent on weapons from Lockheed Martin and Boeing and
Raytheon.--Frida Berrigan, "U.S.
Arming of Israel: How U.S. Weapons Manufacturers Profit From Middle East
Conflict," democracynow.org, July 21, 2006]
[Back to 1982, . . . the neo-cons who at that time had already crawled from
the primal slime and were doing exactly what they are doing now: advising an
American president to give Israel the green light to "solve its security
problems" by destroying Lebanon.
In 1982 Israel had a problem. Yasir Arafat, headquartered in Beirut, was
making ready to announce that the PLO was prepared to sit down with Israel
and embark on peaceful, good faith negotiations towards a two-state
solution.
Israel didn't want a two-state solution, which meant - if UN resolutions
were to be taken seriously - a Palestinian state right next door, with
water, and contiguous territory. So Israel decided chase the PLO right out
of Lebanon. It announced that the Palestinian fighters had broken the
year-long cease-fire by lobbing some shells into northern Israel.--Alexander
Cockburn, "Hezbollah, Hamas
and Israel: Everything You Need To Know," counterpunch.org, July 21,
2006]
[Britain and the United States find themselves isolated in the UN Security
Council in resisting calls for an immediate cessation of hostilities in the
Middle East.--James Bone, "Britain
and US block ceasefire calls," Times, July 21, 2006]
[Bush denounces Syria and Iran for allegedly arming Hezbollah, while he
rushes more deadly weapons to Israel. . . .
Bush's war is not on terror. Bush's war is on Muslim states not ruled by
American puppets. --Paul Craig Roberts, "US Complicit in
Destruction of Lebanon," antiwar.com, July 24, 2006]
[Israel, since its inception, has never declared its borders. Its so-called
borders are "armistice lines" which reflect the result of military conflict.
The only reason, for example, that Israel's border with Lebanon is where it
is, and not on the Litani river, is the dogged resistance of
Hizbullah--Gabriel Ash, "Israel, Lebanon:
Defense Against the Black Arts," dissidentvoice.org, July 24, 2006]
[According to Joseph Cirincione, an arms expert and the author of Deadly
Arsenals: Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Threats, "The neoconservatives
are now hoping to use the Israeli-Lebanon conflict as the trigger to launch
a U.S. war against Syria, Iran or both."--James Bamford, "Iran: The Next War," Rolling Stone, July 2006]
[Hizbullah's capture of two Israeli soldiers on July 12 was a direct result
of Israel's silent but unrelenting aggression against Lebanon, which in turn
is part of a six-decades long Arab-Israeli conflict.
Since its withdrawal of occupation forces from southern Lebanon in May 2000,
Israel has violated the United Nations-monitored "blue line" on an almost
daily basis, according to UN reports. Hizbullah's military
doctrine, articulated in the early 1990s, states that it will fire Katyusha
rockets into Israel only in response to Israeli attacks on Lebanese
civilians or Hizbullah's leadership; this indeed has been the
pattern.--Anders Strindberg, "Hizbullah's
attacks stem from Israeli incursions into Lebanon," Christian
Science Monitor, August 1, 2006]
[But the question of prisoners held by Israel - nearly all of them
Palestinians - is the subtext of this crisis and likely to figure in its
resolution. . . . The prisoners number about 9,700, about 100 of them women,
according to a spokeswoman for the Israeli Prison Authority.--Craig S.
Smith, "The
prisoners that Hezbollah is fighting for," New York Times, August 4,
2006]
[Now comes the war in Lebanon and proves that this was a mistake. Although
the Syrians sat on the sidelines, the danger from that direction was not
removed and the delusion that the Golan would forever remain in Israeli
hands, without our being asked to pay for its occupation, is now slapping us
in the face.--Gideon Levy, "The real estate
war," Haaretz, August 7, 2006]
[Bodies with dead tissues and no apparent wounds; 'shrunken' corpses;
civilians with heavy damage to lower limbs that require amputation, which is
nevertheless followed by unstoppable necrosis and death; descriptions of
extensive internal wounds with no trace of shrapnel, corpses blackened but
not burnt, and others heavily wounded that did not bleed.--Paola Manduca,
"New and unkown deadly weapons used by Israeli
forces," GlobalResearch.ca, August 7, 2006]
[ . . . six Israeli civilians had been killed in the six years prior to the
Israeli invasion - one by a falling anti-aircraft round fired at Israeli
aircraft violating Lebanese airspace and five in an August 2002 Palestinian
operation that was likely aided by Hezbollah. . . .
roughly twenty Lebanese civilians were killed either by hostile action or by
mines left behind by the IDF.
During the same period, 25 Israeli soldiers were killed in Hezbollah
attacks; that number includes the eight soldiers killed in the July 12
incident that triggered the invasion.--Ken Silverstein, "Israel's
March of Folly," Harpers, August 7, 2006]
[Israel's first leader, David Ben-Gurion, believed the natural border of the
Jewish state should be Lebanon's Litani River, and this legacy has
apparently guided the Israeli army ever since.--Ran HaCohen, "The End of
Lebanon?," antiwar.com, August 8, 2006]
[Since Israel's withdrawal from southern Lebanon in May 2000, there have
been hundreds of violations of the "blue line" between the two countries.
The United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (Unifil) reports that Israeli
aircraft crossed the line "on an almost daily basis" between 2001 and 2003,
and "persistently" until 2006. . . .
[ . . . control of water has long driven much of Israeli policy toward
her neighbors. Many, including former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel
Sharon, have acknowledged the water origins of the Six Day War that brought
Sheba'a Farms under Israeli control, and as recently as 2002 Israel almost
declared war on Lebanon for diverting water from the Wazzani
Springs to border villages.
Much of Mt. Hermon's snowmelt happens to feed into the Jordan River system.
With concerns that the river could run dry within a few years because of
overuse, control of all the headwaters becomes even more vital to Israel's
interests. . . .
Regardless of whether Sheba'a Farms belongs to Syria or Lebanon, according
to UN Resolution 242 (1967), Israel should have withdrawn long ago from this
and other areas occupied after the Six Day War.-- Margaret Griffis, "Sheba'a Farms: Much Ado
About Nothing?," antiwar.com, August 12, 2006]
[Pulitzer Prize-winning US journalist Seymour
Hersh writes that US President George W. Bush and Vice-President Dick
Cheney were convinced that a successful Israeli bombing campaign against
Hezbollah could ease Israel's security concerns and also serve as a prelude
to a potential US pre-emptive attack to destroy Iran's nuclear
installations.
Citing an unnamed Middle East expert with knowledge of the thinking of the
Israeli and US Governments, Israel had devised a plan for attacking
Hezbollah - and shared it with Bush administration officials - well before
the July 12 kidnappings.--Abraham Rabinovich, "US helped
plan offensive, says New Yorker magazine," News.com, August 14, 2006]
[ . . . the Lebanese Hizbollah guerrilla army has, in effect, won this round
of their war with Israel. . . . there is no more sign that Hizbollah intends
to "disarm" under the terms of UN Security Council resolutions 1559 and 1701
than Israel is prepared to abide by UN Security Council Resolution 242 and
withdraw from Arab territories it occupied in 1967.--Robert Fisk "In the
face of Bush's lies, it's left to Assad to tell the truth," Independent,
August 16, 2006]
[This claim is made by citizens of a state who know very well where to turn
off Ibn Gvirol Street in Tel Aviv to get to the security-military complex
that is located in the heart of their civilian city; this claim is repeated
by the parents of armed soldiers who bring their weapons home on weekends,
and is recited by soldiers whose bases are adjacent to Jewish settlements in
the West Bank and who have shelled civilian Palestinian neighborhoods from
positions and tanks that have been stationed inside civilian
settlements.--Amira Hass, "Nasrallah
didn't mean to," Haaretz, August 17, 2006]
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon . . . plans to submit a report to the
United Nations General Assembly at the end of the month, stating that damage
Israel caused to the oil reservoir polluted Lebanon's coast, and that the
pollution spread to neighboring countries, especially Syria.--Roee Nahmias,
"Report:
UN to demand Israel pay Lebanon $1 billion," ynetnews.com, September
6, 2008