by Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
Triumphalists are getting off on Iraq again, intoning hallelujah songs as
they did after staging the fall of
Saddam's statue then again and again, sweet lullabies to send us into
blissful sleep and wake to a new dawn. The composers and orchestrators -
Blair, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Straw, Hoon and Rice - still believe history
is on their side.
Bush visited his troops at Camp Victory in Iraq this month and said: "Iraq
had a record of supporting terror, of developing and using weapons of mass
destruction, was routinely firing at American military personnel,
systematically violating UN resolutions ... Iraqis, once afraid to leave
their homes are going back to school and shopping in malls ... American
troops are returning home because of success." Only one shoe and one without
a sharp stiletto was hurled at him by Muntadar al-Zaidi, an Iraqi who begged
to differ.
Gordon Brown, also in Iraq, spun his own fairy tale of Baghdad, where
everyone is living happily ever after and British soldiers come home proud
heroes. The reality is that some of our soldiers are broken - physically and
mentally - fighting this illegal and unpopular war and that too many did
terrible things in the land of endless tears. General Sir Mike Jackson now
blames the Americans for their "appalling" decisions. And yet he too insists
the campaign was a success.
Even the choral backers of Bush and Blair, once oh-so-influential, sound
tinny now, out of tune. In a new book, The Liberal Defence Of Murder,
Richard Seymour names many usually enlightened individuals who cheered on
the disgraceful crusade and have now gone silent. Others who supported the
adventure have escaped through passages of ingenious exculpation. Most
Tories, for example, now say they were hypnotised by the Government's false
dossiers.
Really? Even hard-of-hearing Mrs Kirkpatrick down the road - she's 79 Ð
understood that we were being deceived. The UN weapons inspectors Hans Blix
and Scott Ritter both told us there were no WMDs. Ken Clarke said this
weekend: "I opposed the Iraq war. I'm not sure whether anybody believed
Saddam had weapons of mass destruction that were a threat to anybody. Most
American spies didn't believe that, most British spies didn't believe that
and most of the Foreign Office didn't believe that".
Nor did the Opposition but it still backed Blair because Conservatives love
wars and one against a swarthy potentate was irresistible.
So to Iraqis, the beneficiaries of our noble "sacrifices". This week Nahla
Hussein, a left-wing, feminist Kurdish Iraqi, was shot and beheaded for her
campaigning zeal. Fifty-seven Iraqis were blown up in Kirkuk. Christians in
Mosul are being savagely persecuted and sharia law has replaced the 1959
codified entitlements given to women in family disputes. Women in Iraq have
fewer rights today than under Saddam. Yes, there is some normality in parts
but tensions between Shias and Sunnis are explosive. When troops are
withdrawn next year, expect more bloodshed. The resources of Iraq,
meanwhile, are being plundered.
For these blessings, one million Iraqis had to die and their children still
suffer from illnesses caused by our weapons and our war. Five million Iraqis
are displaced and, of these, the US took in 1,700. It is easier for an Iraqi
cat or dog to gain entry to the land of the free. Try Baghdad Pups, which
offers (for a hefty fee) to get the adopted pets of US soldiers into
America. In 2007, 39,000 Iraqis sought refuge in the EU countries and we
took in 300. Sweden, which has no responsibility for the havoc, gave refuge
to 18,000.
I have been talking to exiled Iraqis in London. One young man has a child
whose mother killed herself after giving birth during the war. He both loves
and hates this country, as did Bilal Abdullah, the NHS doctor convicted for
dreadful plans to blow up people in the UK. A beautiful Iraqi woman told me
her nephew gave plastic flowers to our soldiers when first they went into
Basra. Last year, they shot him dead, mistaking him for an enemy.
On Friday, I met an Iraqi artist, Yousif Nasser, whose studio has become a
hub for other exiles, artists, musicians and the mentally ill seeking art
therapy. A gentle, melancholic man, he showed me his series titled "Black
Rain", enormous works depicting the violence in Iraq: "There are no bodies,
only pieces, bits, of a little bit of this and that. People don't buy my
pictures - they are too dark. How can I tell you what has happened to my
country? I have no words, only these images."
I have words, too weak and inadequate to carry the rage felt by millions at
the renewed arrogance of the villains who first devastated Iraq and now
garland themselves. Lies, lies and now delusion. There is no glory to be
salvaged in this desert.
ORIGINAL TEXT
[The invasion of Iraq was a bandit act, an act of blatant state terrorism, demonstrating
absolute contempt for the concept of international law.--Harold Pinter, "The Nobel Lecture: Art, Truth and
Politics," Nobelprize.org, December 7, 2005]
Katrina Vanden Heuvel, "The Enormous
Cost of War," Nation, August 17, 2007
Simon Tisdall, "Draft Agreement Promises Troop
Withdrawal By 2011," Guardian, October 16, 2008
Seumas Milne, "Britain leaves Iraq in shame. The US won't go so
quietly," Guardian, December 11, 2008
[British diplomats and military experts returning from Kabul have three
performance modes. In public they declare Afghanistan to be tough but
winnable. In private they admit it is getting worse not better, but might
turn round in a decade if only the Afghans were less corrupt. In totally
secret mode, their eyes turn to the sky and they declare the whole business
a "total effing disaster".--Simon Jenkins, "Rosy rewriting of the Iraq debacle will fuel worse
disaster in Afghanistan," Guardian, December 19, 2008]
[As George W. Bush and Dick Cheney make their case for some positive legacy
from the past eight years, two arguments are playing key roles: the notion
that torturing terror suspects saved American lives and the belief that
Bush's Iraq troop "surge" transformed a disaster into something close to
"victory."--Robert Parry, "Two Dangerous Bush-Cheney Myths,"
consortiumnews.com, December 26, 2008]
Anthony Shadid, "An Hour at a Crowded Baghdad
Checkpoint Reveals Pervasive Nature of Capital's Hated Barriers,"
Washington Post, December 31, 2008
[Under the Personal Status Law in force since Jul. 14, 1958, when Iraqis
overthrew the British-installed monarchy, Iraqi women had most of the rights
that Western women do.
Now they have Article 2 of the Constitution: "Islam is the official religion
of the state and is a basic source of legislation." Sub-head A says "No law
can be passed that contradicts the undisputed rules of Islam." Under this
Article the interpretation of women's rights is left to religious leaders -
and many of them are under Iranian influence.--Abdu Rahman and Dahr Jamail,
"Women Miss Saddam," antiwar.com, March 13, 2010]