The N.Y. Times reported on January 31 about the most recent attempt by the
American Jewish Community to conflate intense criticism of Israel with
anti-Semitism. In a neat little example of slippery slope, the report on
"Progressive Jewish Thought and the New Anti-Semitism" written by Alvin H.
Rosenfeld moves from exposing the actual anti-Semitism of those who deny
Israel's right to exist - and hence deny to the Jewish people the same right
to national self-determination that they grant to every other people on the
planet (the anti-war group International Answer is a good example of that,
though Rosenfeld doesn't cite them) - to those who powerfully and consistently
attack Israel's policies toward Palestinians, see Israel as racist the way
that it treats Israeli-Arabs (or even Sephardic Jews), or who analogize
Israel's policies to those of apartheid as instituted by South Africa.
The Anti-Defamation League sponsored a conference on this same topic in San
Francisco on Jan.28, conspicuously failing to invite Tikkun, Jewish Voices
for Peace and Brit Tzedeck ve Shalom, the three major Jewish voices
critiquing Israeli policy yet also strong supporters of Israel's security.
Meanwhile, the media has been abuzz with stories of Jews denouncing former
President Jimmy Carter for his book Palestine: Peace or Apartheid. The same
charges of anti-Semitism that have consistently been launched against anyone
who criticizes Israeli policy is now being launched against the one American
leader who managed to create a lasting (albeit cold) peace between Israel
and a major Arab state (Egypt). Instead of seriously engaging with the
issues raised (e.g. to what extent are Israel's current policies similar to
those of apartehid and to what extent are they not?) the Jewish
establishment and media responds by attacking the people who raise these or
any other critiques--shifting the discourse to the legitimacy of the
messenger and thus avoiding the substance of the criticisms. Knowing this,
many people become fearful that they too will be labeled "anti-Semitic" if
they question the wisdom of Israeli policies or if they seek to organize
politically to challenge those policies.
Yet there is nothing "new" about this or about this alleged anti-Semitism
that these mainstream Jewish voices seek to reveal. From the moment I
started Tikkun Magazine twenty years ago as "the liberal alternative to
Commentary and the voices of Jewish conservatism and spiritual deadness in
the organized Jewish community" our magazine has been attacked in much of
the organized Jewish community as "self-hating Jews" (though our editorial
advisory board contains some of the most creative Jewish theologians,
rabbis, Israeli peace activist and committed fighters for social justice).
The reason? We believe that Israeli policy toward Palestinians, manifested
most dramatically in the Occupation of the West Bank for what will soon be
forty years and in the refusal of Israel to take any moral responsibility
for its part in the creation of the Arab refugee problem, is immoral,
irrational, self-destructive, a violation of the highest values of the
Jewish people, and a serious impediment to world peace.
What the Jewish establishment organizations have done is to make invisible
the strong roots in Judaism for a different kind of policy. The most
frequently repeated injunction in Torah are variations of the following
command: "Do not oppress the stranger (the 'other'). Remember that you were
strangers in the land of Egypt." Instead, the Jewish establishment has
turned Judaism into a cheer-leading religion for a particular national state
that has a lot of Jews, but has seriously lost site of the Jewish values
which early Zionists hoped would find realization there.
The impact of the silencing of debate about Israeli policy on Jewish life
has been devastating. We at Tikkun are constantly encountering young Jews
who say that they can no longer identify with their Jewishness, because they
have been told that their own intuitive revulsion at watching the Israeli
settlers with IDF support violate the human rights of Palestinian civilians
in the West Bank or their own questioning of Israel's right to occupy the
West Bank are proof that they are "self-hating Jews." The Jewish world is
driving away its own young.
But the most destructive impact of this new Jewish Political Correctness is
on American foreign policy debates. We at Tikkun have been involved in
trying to create a liberal alternative to AIPAC and the other
Israel-can-do-no-wrong voices in American politics. When we talk to
Congressional representatives who are liberal or even extremely progressive
on every other issue, they tell us privately that they are afraid to speak
out about the way Israeli policies are destructive to the best interests of
the United States or the best interests of world peace - lest they too be
labeled anti-Semitic and anti-Israel. If it can happen to Jimmy Carter, some
of them told me recently, a man with impeccable moral credentials, then no
one is really politically safe.
When this bubble of repression of dialogue explodes into open resentment at
the way Jewish Political correctness has been imposed, it may really yield a
"new" anti-Semitism. To prevent that, the voices of dissent on Israeli
policy must be given the same national exposure in the media and American
politics that the voices of the Jewish establishment have been given.
We hope that the creation of our INTEFAITH Network of Spiritual
Progressives (NSP at www.spiritualprogressives.org) can provide a safe
context for this kind of discussion among the many Christians, Muslims,
Unitarians, Hindus, Buddhists and secular-but-not-religious people who share
some of the criticisms of Israel and who will eventually try to challenge
the kind of anti-Semitism that might be released against Jews once the
resentment about Jewish Political Correctness on Israel does explode. Even
better if we could succeed in creating a powerful alternative to AIPAC.
Unfortunately, that path is not so easy. When we approached some of the
Israel peace groups to form an alliance with us to build the alternative to
AIPAC we found that the hold of the Jewish Establishment was so powerful
that it had managed to seep into the brains of people in organizations like
Americans for Peace Now (NOT the Israeli group Peace Now which has been very
courageous), Brit Tzedeck ve'Shalom and the Israel Policy Forum or the
Religious Action Center of the Reform movement--and as a result these peace
voices are continually fearful that they will be "discredited" if they align
with each other and with us to create this alternative to AIPAC. Meanwhile,
while they look over their right shoulders fearfully, the very people that
they fear will "discredit" them for aligning with each other and with us are
ALREADY discrediting them as much as they possibly can.