WASHINGTON -- President Bush on Tuesday said that Israel's air
strike in Syria was part of an "essential" campaign to defend the
country, and drew a parallel between U.S. policy on terrorism and
the actions being taken by Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.
Bush's supportive remarks toward Sharon, similar to comments he made
Monday, also came with a caution. He said he would continue to press
Sharon to be wary of creating "the conditions necessary for"
increasing, rather than reducing, the violence. . . .
FULL TEXT
"Israel
hits Palestinian 'camp' in Syria," BBC News, October 5, 2003
[Israel received the Green Light. It came from what is called the
Syria Accountability Act, moving through the United States Congress
with the help of Israel's supporters, that will impose sanctions on
Damascus for its supposed enthusiasm for "terrorism" and occupation
of Lebanon.--Robert Fisk, "Israel's attack is a lethal step towards war in Middle
East," Independent, October 6, 2003]
Jim Lobe, "New
Cheney Adviser Sets Syria In His Sights," Inter Press Service, October 20, 2003
Anton La Guardia, "Assad given weapons ultimatum," The
Telegraph (UK), January 7, 2004
[First, Israel was able to strike at Syria without suffering any
consequences, military or diplomatic. Second, Israel might take steps to
fulfill one of its ultimate security objectives, which is to prevent other
countries in the Middle East from obtaining nuclear capability, especially
those overtly hostile to Israel. Third, if a Syrian nuclear installation can
be targeted by Israel without any international outcry Ð and with the tacit
backing of allies in the US and Turkey Ð Iran's nuclear facilities are
looking more likely than ever to be next.--Ilene R. Prusher, "Israel sends
Middle East a message with Syrian airstrike," Christian Science Monitor,
september 19, 2007]