Enver Masud, "U.S. Violating Nuclear Non-Proliferation
Treaty," The Wisdom Fund, March 11, 2003
Uri Avnery, "Oil, Sharon and the Axis of Evil," CounterPunch, February 11,
2003
["Senior Bush administration officials will meet Tuesday at the
White House to discuss the evolving strategy toward the Islamic
republic, with Pentagon officials pressing hard for public and
private actions that they believe could lead to the toppling of the
government through a popular uprising, officials said."--Glenn
Kessler, "U.S. Eyes Pressing Uprising In Iran," Washington Post,
May 25, 2003]
["Iran on Wednesday denied U.S. allegations that it had secret
atomic facilities or links with al Qaeda and accused Washington of
double standards in the war on terror. "--"Iran Denies Secret Nuclear Sites, Al Qaeda Links," Reuters,
May 28, 2003]
[About fifty years ago, in July 1953, the U.S. secretary of state
held a press conference in which he stated, "The growing activities
of the illegal Communist Party in Iran and the toleration of them by
the Iranian government has caused our government much concern." On
August 19, a pro-Shah demonstration arose spontaneously in a Teheran
bazaar. The demonstration seemed to express public alarm at the
plans of the Communist Party to declare Iran a republic. By the end
of the day, a retired general and a former cabinet member, Fazlollah
Zahedi, had taken over as the new premier. The deposed premier,
71-year old Mohammed Mossadeq, and his cohorts were either in hiding
or had been captured. The Shah returned shortly to Iran, where he
was given a rousing reception. The U.S. claimed another victory
against the evil empire, saying Iran had been prevented from falling
behind the Iron Curtain.--Ahmad Faruqui, "The Oily
Business of Regime Change," CounterPunch, May 28, 2003]
Guy Dinmore, "Bush pressed to pursue 'regime change' in Iran," Financial Times, June 17, 2003
[Soon after Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon called for the U.S.
Army to march on Tehran, his American neo-conservative supporters
launched a get-Iran campaign, featuring the identical propaganda
they used to fan war fever against Iraq: weapons of mass
destruction; threats to the U.S.; terrorism and human rights
violations. Some imaginative neo-cons even claim Saddam's unfindable
weapons were moved to Iran.--Eric Margolis, "Iran's in
the crosshairs of Bush's bombsight," Toronto Sun, June 22, 2003]
Richard Morin and Claudia Deane, "Poll: Majority Backs Use of Force in Iran,"
Washington Post, June 24, 2003
"Iran announces 38.5 billion barrels of 'heavy' oil find,"
IRNA, July 14, 2003
Jamie Wilson, "Make Iran next, says Ayatollah's grandson," The
Observer, August 10, 2003
[Much of the pressure is coming from the Israeli prime minister,
Ariel Sharon, and the same neo-conservative friends of his in
Washington who drove the war on Iraq. . . .
The original idea was that all nuclear-weapons states would move
towards disarmamament, a pledge that the US, Britain and the other
three declared bomb-owners made in 1995. Now we have a kind of class
distinction. The US continues to develop new forms of nuclear
weapons. US-friendly states that refused to sign the
non-proliferation treaty (NPT) but have nuclear weapons - like
India, Israel and Pakistan - are treated with kid gloves. An
NPT-signer such as Iran, against whom Washington bears ancient
grudges, is threatened with punishment, and possible
force.--Jonathan Steele, "Don't
be fooled. The Iraqi maelstrom won't save Iran," Guardian, October 3, 2003]
[Officials confirm that the nation can now launch nuclear weapons
from land, sea and air. The issue complicates efforts to rein in
Iran. --Douglas Frantz, "Israel Adds Subs to Its Atomic Ability,"
Los Angeles Times, October 12, 2003]
Gordon Thomas, "Israeli Subs Have Nukes Aimed at Iranian
Sites," American Free Press, October 18, 2003
Guy Dinmore, "US stalls on Iranian
offer of reform deal," Financial Times, March 16 2004